Cases 1 - 10 of 173
Newton v. G.E.O Group, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Earl Nicholas Newton
Defendant:
G.E.O Group, Inc, C. O. Fields, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Jimmy Fant, Jr.
as 24-2115
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jimmy Fant, Jr.
Hallman v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Robert F Hallman
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Detective McKee FNU, Ashlea Deener and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DURHAM v. NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON et al
as 3:2023cv20485
Plaintiff:
TREMAYNE DURHAM
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, A. GANGI, C. SEARS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fant v. Weeks et al
as 2:2023cv02552
Plaintiff:
Willie Marshall Fant
Defendant:
Robert Weeks, Joseph Palazollo and Brett Simonsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FANT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv22120
Plaintiff:
WENDELL FANT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wynn v. Warren
as 23-942
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James I. Wynn, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Phillip Lytle, LLP, Esq. Richard Evans, Cheswold (TL) LLC and others
Defendant:
Judge Paul R. Warren, Judge Thomas E. Moran and Judge Sam L. Valleriani
Fant et al v. GoFit LLC
as 8:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
Marshall A Fant, III and Gretchen K Fant
Defendant:
GoFit LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wynn v. Warren
as 23-48
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James I. Wynn, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Phillip Lytle, LLP, Esq. Richard Evans, Lorenzo Napolitano, Esq. Referee and others
Defendant:
Judge Paul R. Warren, Thomas E. Moran and Judge Sam L. Valleriani
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
