Cases 51 - 58 of 58
-JS In Re: BAYSIDE LITIGATION, et al v. , et al
as 1:1997cv05127
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
TONY BACON , ANDREW GORDON , MICHAEL S. SHONTZ and others
Consol_defendant:
CLEMENT , MYERS , JOHN CONESKY and others
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dutton et al v. Bryer et al
as 1:2009cv00598
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Dutton and Janice Ryng-Dutton
Defendant:
Lisa Bryer, Michael Gray, Frederick Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Beasley v. GC Services Limited Partnership
as 4:2009cv01748
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Callahan, Clara Loya, Linda E. Starkweather and others
Defendant:
GC Services, L.P., GC Services Corp., GC Services, LP and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lora Meyers and Erika Beasey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Brown v. Beckett et al
as 2:2009cv02226
Plaintiff:
Frederick Brown
Defendant:
William Beckett, ECIH and Roger E Walker, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Roberts et al
as 5:2009cv00117
Plaintiff:
Frederick Brown
Defendant:
Steve Roberts, Sue Mickens, Doctor Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Ozmint et al
as 2:2007cv02296
Plaintiff:
Frederick Brown
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, Robert Ward, Stan Burtt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Brown v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2007cv00079
Plaintiff:
Frederick Brown
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, James E. Donald, Bruce Chatman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re Harmonic Inc. Securities Litigation
as 4:2000cv02287
Defendant:
Harmonic Inc. , Anthony J. Ley , Robin N. Dickson and others
Plaintiff:
Robert G. Knollenberg , Hans-Peter Wild , Bruce Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
