Cases 71 - 80 of 11,714
Hill et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Hill, Stephen Donald Delcuze, Julio Delgado and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Graham v. Cadence Bank
as 6:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Jack Graham
Defendant:
Trustee Cadence Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Sorbello v. Agco Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Sorbello
Defendant:
Agco Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
CITY OF GRAHAM v. THE 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
CITY OF GRAHAM
Defendant:
THE 3M COMPANY, AGC, INC., AGC CHEMICALS AMERICAS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Burton et al v. Bluefield Realty Group, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv01800
Plaintiff:
Shauntell Burton, Benny D. Cheatham, Robert Douglass and others
Defendant:
Bluefield Realty Group, LLC, Allen Tate Real Estate, LLC, McClendon Realty, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Hollinger et al v. Menges et al
as 1:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Terry-Lee: Hollinger and Michelle-Lynn: Hollinger
Defendant:
Judge Matthew D. Menges, Allison Blew, Sheriff Richard P. Keuleber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Graham v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 24-10642
Petitioner:
JAMES MARTIN GRAHAM
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - LOW
Ashley Casanova v. Joe Biden
as 24-1235
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY CASANOVA
Defendant:
PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, NORTH CAROLINA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
