Cases 1 - 10 of 314
Gage v. People of the State of California
as 4:2024cv02100
Petitioner:
Kenneth Eugene Gage
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Corderick v. Warden C.S.P. Solano
as 3:2024cv01939
Petitioner:
Dewayne Gage Corderick
Respondent:
Warden C.S.P. Solano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smith v. Reynolds
as 1:2024cv00517
Petitioner:
Gage L. Smith
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lint v. USA
as 2:2024cv00185
Petitioner:
Gage McClellan Lint
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Deville v. Sieveking et al
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
John Deville, Jr
Defendant:
Johnny Sieveking, Kobe Lacombe, Jordan Santoyo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harkins v. Wapinsky et al
as 4:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Gage A. Harkins
Defendant:
David Wapinsky and C.O. Matthew Donnelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crippin #682304 v. Strickland et al
as 1:2023cv01277
Plaintiff:
Devin James-Richard Crippin #682304
Defendant:
Unknown Strickland, Unknown Hicks, Unknown Armio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barney v. Annucci et al
as 9:2023cv01150
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah A. Barney, Sr.
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, D. Venettozzi, A. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gage v. Vernon County, Missouri et al
as 3:2023cv05066
Plaintiff:
Ashley Gage
Defendant:
Vernon County, Missouri, Jason Mosher, Eric Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Titus v. Mercer et al
as 8:2023cv00377
Plaintiff:
Shawn Titus
Defendant:
Bryan Mercer, Thomas Brentley, Gage Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
