Cases 1 - 10 of 274
NEW JERSEY DEER CONTROL, LLC v. EN GARDE DEER DEFENSE, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05587
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY DEER CONTROL, LLC
Defendant:
EN GARDE DEER DEFENSE, LLC and JEFFREY ARDO
CONWELL v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEO CONWELL
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, JENNIFER FRENCH, RAY DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS v. SILVIA et al
as 1:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Defendant:
SILVIA, DUNLAP, WELCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flemons v. Phoenix Union High School District et al
as 2:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Estaban Flemons
Defendant:
Phoenix Union High School District, Phoenix Union High School District Governing Board, Chad E Gestson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coleman v. Phoenix Union High School District et al
as 2:2023cv02616
Plaintiff:
April Coleman
Defendant:
Phoenix Union High School District, Phoenix Union High School District Governing Board, Chad E Gestson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jasper Frazier v. Voyle Gard, et al
as 23-3181
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant / Appellee:
VOYLE D. GARD, incorrectly identified as "CAPTAIN GARB", BRANDON WORTH, EVERETT DUNN and others
PELINI et al v. AMSLER et al
as 2:2023cv01685
Defendant:
AG WEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC, DONALD S. AMSLER, D.S.A. SMART FUND, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PELINI and RICHARD A. PELINI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Gard et al v. TGS-Nopec Geophysical Company
as 5:2023cv00705
Plaintiff:
Gene Gard and Paula Gard
Defendant:
TGS-Nopec Geophysical Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
WRIGHT v. DUNN et al
as 1:2023cv01363
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
DUNN, MARK SEVIER, JENNIFER FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
