Cases 21 - 30 of 2,818
Greer v. Lumpkin
as 24-50186
Petitioner:
Otis Greer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Schlemm, David v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
David A. Schlemm
Defendant:
Kevin A. Carr, Edward Wall, Larry Fuchs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell et al v. Schroeder et al
as 0:2024cv00913
Plaintiff:
Venedia Larita Campbell and Martin Alan Smith, II
Defendant:
Andrew William Schroeder, Kyle Allen Williams, Paul Franz Albers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Greer v. Harreld et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Steven E. Greer
Defendant:
Susan Harreld, Michael Harreld, Sr., Sarah Conroy Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Frederick S. Koger v. Charles E. Kleidon, et al
as 24-1324
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK S. KOGER
Defendant:
CHARLES E. KLEIDON, HOWARD T. GREER, ROBERT J. BILOTTI and others
Greer v. FCA US LLC
as 2:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
Michael Greer
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Greer v. Trinity Health Corporation
as 2:2024cv10504
Plaintiff:
Marion Greer
Defendant:
Trinity Health Corporation
Custis v. Accomack County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
William Parke Custis
Defendant:
Accomack County Sheriff's Office, Wayne Greer, Donnie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Thornell et al
as 3:2024cv08038
Petitioner:
Alexander Greer Williams
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
