Cases 1 - 10 of 698
Gross v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv04076
Plaintiff:
Shauna Marie Gross
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00492
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gross v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv01722
Plaintiff:
Frederick Gross
Defendant:
James C Johnson and County of Suffolk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Mosely et al
as 2:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bowman
Defendant:
Detective Marlena Mosely, City of Philadelphia, Detective Dennis Dusack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
MARTIN et al v. MCCORKLE et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MARTIN
Defendant:
T. MCCORKLE, CONYERS, D. REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Cheney et al
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Brandon Anthony Ramos
Defendant:
Cheney, Cauley, Scagliarini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrone Bell v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1001
Plaintiff:
TYRONE ANTHONY BELL
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC Director, RICHARD RUSSELL, Legal Administrator, GARY MINIARD, Warden and others
Gross v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv02088
Petitioner:
Donald Gross
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Moore v. Deritis et al
as 4:2023cv06274
Plaintiff:
Austin Ryan Moore
Defendant:
Nicholas Deritis, Dana Crowell, Emerson L. Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
