Cases 1 - 10 of 100
HIGGINS v. NOVO NORDISK INC., et al
as 2:2026cv04644
Plaintiff:
DAVID HIGGINS
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC., and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HIGGINS v. REGIONS MORTGAGE
as 3:2026cv00080
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HIGGINS
Defendant:
REGIONS MORTGAGE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv05106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Rice v. Higgins et al
as 4:2026cv00648
Plaintiff:
Antonio Rice
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, B Levingston and A Tremble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brannen v. Pulaski County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2026cv00623
Plaintiff:
Frank James Brannen
Defendant:
Pulaski County Sheriff's Office, Eric Higgins, Charles Hendrix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Higgins et al v. Liberty Township et al
as 1:2026cv01749
Plaintiff:
Conan Higgins and Ryan J. Morris
Defendant:
Liberty Township, Walter Barlow, Robert Bobby Keilholtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pacific Life Insurance Company v. Higgins
as 3:2026cv00176
Plaintiff:
Pacific Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Amanda Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Higgins-Bey v. Halvorsen et al
as 1:2026cv07152
Plaintiff:
Lowell Higgins-Bey
Defendant:
Ernest Halvorsen, Edwin Dickinson, Reynaldo Guevara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Blue Best LLC v. True Pros, LLC et al
as 2:2026cv00552
Plaintiff:
Blue Best LLC
Defendant:
True Pros, LLC and Kathryne Higgins
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Keith Eskew v. C. Barrett, et al
as 26-2157
Plaintiff:
Keith Andre Eskew
Defendant:
C. Barrett, Deputy Sheriff, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility and Eric Higgins, Sheriff, Pulaski County
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
