Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Honeycutt v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv00799
Plaintiff:
Henry Honeycutt
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cameron v. Honeycutt
as 2:2026cv02678
Petitioner:
James Edward Cameron
Respondent:
Clayton Honeycutt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bruton v. Cumberland County et al
as 5:2026cv00393
Plaintiff:
Sondra N. Bruton
Defendant:
Cumberland County, City of Fayetteville, Town of Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BUSCH v. BLAIR et al
as 1:2026cv02044
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BUSCH
Defendant:
RAINER M. BLAIR, MATTHEW R. MCGREW, EMMANUEL LIGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
KOEHLER v. BLAIR et al
as 1:2026cv01566
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KOEHLER
Defendant:
RAINER M. BLAIR, MATT MCGREW, EMMANUEL LIGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 j(b) Stockholder Suit
Markarian v. Blair et al
as 1:2026cv00468
Plaintiff:
Harry Markarian
Defendant:
Rainer M. Blair, Joakim Weidemanis, Daniel A. Raskas and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Vernon et al v. Chutz et al
as 3:2026cv00417
Plaintiff:
MaReisha Vernon
Defendant:
Danny Honeycutt, Daniel Honeycutt, Clabert Chutz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Honeycutt v. Bisignano
as 1:2026cv00878
Plaintiff:
Louisa Honeycutt
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Miles v. Glen Chase Honeycutt
as 4:2026cv02529
Plaintiff:
Jesse Miles
Defendant:
Glen Chase Honeycutt doing business as Brothers Steel Buildings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
Womble v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2026cv00075
Plaintiff:
Edward Lamont Womble
Defendant:
Ronnie L. Honeycutt, FNU Moss, FNU Miztel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
