Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Hatchett v. Reynolds et al
as 3:2026cv00503
Plaintiff:
Marchenne Hatchett
Defendant:
Matt Reynolds and Lynn Fitch
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Hatchett v. Clark
as 2:2026cv02394
Petitioner:
Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hatchett v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.
as 1:2026cv02608
Plaintiff:
Patricia Hatchett
Defendant:
Publix Super Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Hatchett Creek Hunting Club, Inc et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
as 1:2026cv00646
Plaintiff:
Hatchett Creek Hunting Club, Inc and Randall Carlton
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Hatchett #800786 v. Christiansen
as 1:2026cv01176
Petitioner:
Tiesean Hatchett #800786
Respondent:
John Christiansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Susan Carre v. Colette Nutton, et al
as 26-1271
Plaintiff:
SUSAN R. CARRE
Defendant:
COLETTE NUTTON, HOWARD COLLENS, CAROLE SENDEK and others
Hatchett v. Whitehorn et al
as 1:2026cv01088
Plaintiff:
Michael Hatchett, Jr
Defendant:
Elizabeth M Whitehorn and Kevin Duesterhaus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Day v. Hatchett
as 4:2026cv00029
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Day
Defendant:
OIC/Lt. Hatchett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatchett v. City of Jackson et al
as 3:2026cv00077
Plaintiff:
Kyrell Hatchett
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Interim Chief Tyree Jones and John/Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hatchett v. Whitehorn et al
as 1:2026cv01038
Plaintiff:
Michael Hatchett, Jr
Defendant:
Elizabeth M Whitehorn and Kevin Duesterhaus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
