Cases 1 - 10 of 3,372
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wyatt v. State of Texas Government System et al
as 1:2023cv01434
Plaintiff:
George Wyatt, Jr. and Lisa M Hill Wyatt
Defendant:
State of Texas Government System, G. Abbott, Mark Hollard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Higgins-Vogt v. USA
as 23-2094
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW HIGGINS-VOGT
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lena Lindberg v. Stone Park Entertainment, et al
as 23-7066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lena Marie Lindberg, In re: United States of America
Defendant / Appellee:
Stone Park Entertainment, doing business as Score's Gentlemans Club, K-Kel, Inc., doing business as Spearmint Rhino Gentlemans Club, Michael Wellek, Owner, Old Higgins Inn and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sherman v. Perkins et al
as 4:2023cv00500
Plaintiff:
Patrick L Sherman
Defendant:
Perkins, Franklin, Franks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
HIGGINS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11424
Plaintiff:
DUSTY HIGGINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
