Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Pacific Life Insurance Company v. Higgins
as 3:2026cv00176
Plaintiff:
Pacific Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Amanda Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Higgins-Bey v. Halvorsen et al
as 1:2026cv07152
Plaintiff:
Lowell Higgins-Bey
Defendant:
Ernest Halvorsen, Edwin Dickinson, Reynaldo Guevara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Blue Best LLC v. True Pros, LLC et al
as 2:2026cv00552
Plaintiff:
Blue Best LLC
Defendant:
True Pros, LLC and Kathryne Higgins
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Keith Eskew v. C. Barrett, et al
as 26-2157
Plaintiff:
Keith Andre Eskew
Defendant:
C. Barrett, Deputy Sheriff, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility and Eric Higgins, Sheriff, Pulaski County
Higgins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2026cv00117
Plaintiff:
Megan BreAnne Higgins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Higgins, Jr. v. State Farm Lloyds
as 3:2026cv00182
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Lee Higgins, Jr.
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Taibbi v. Higgins
as 26-1532
Plaintiff:
MATT TAIBBI
Defendant:
EOIN HIGGINS and BOLD TYPE BOOKS, a division of Hachette Book Group, Inc.
EverCare Choice Inc. v. PKF O'Connor Davies, LLP
as 26-1523
Plaintiff:
EVERCARE CHOICE INC.
Defendant:
PKF O'CONNOR DAVIES, LLP, O'CONNOR DAVIES, LLP, O'CONNOR DAVIES MUNNS & DOBBINS, LLP and others
Benson v. Pryce et al
as 3:2026cv01472
Plaintiff:
Paul Benson
Defendant:
Yolanda Pryce, C. Daniel Higgins, Jr. and Monroe County Domestic Relations Section
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
