Cases 51 - 60 of 140
EPPS et al v. SUPERIOR COURT OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2016cv02455
Plaintiff:
TAMARA EPPS and GEORGE HOPPER
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF JERSEY CITY, Salvatore Bovino, NANCY DOMANSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williamson v. Entrekin et al
as 4:2016cv00688
Plaintiff:
Miguel Williamson
Defendant:
Todd Entrekin, Scott Hassell, Ragless and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopper v. Fenton, et al
as 16-5006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY DEWAYNE HOPPER
Defendant - Appellee:
TODD FENTON and CITY OF CLEVELAND, OKLAHOMA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
R.R. v. Hopper et al (PLR1)
as 3:2015cv00529
Plaintiff:
R. R. and Dania Soto
Defendant:
Adam Hopper, Sevier County Sheriff's Department and Sevier County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Parkside East, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv14060
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Parkside East, Inc. , Holt Manor, Inc. , Kelly Manor, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith et al v. City Of Southaven, Mississippi et al
as 3:2015cv00176
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Denise Smith , Estate of Kaitlyn Taylor Hopper (deceased) and Scott Hopper
Defendant:
City Of Southaven, Mississippi , Dwight Brittain and John Does(s) 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv13511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HART v. HOPPER et al
as 2:2015cv05439
Plaintiff:
GARRETT E. HART
Defendant:
MARY MCFALL HOPPER, DELAWARE COUNTY DEPUTIES JOHN/JANE DOE 1-99, CITY OF CHESTER, PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Lewis v. Gwen Brown, et al
as 15-30864
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CT CORPORATION, CT SYSTEMS CORPORATION, ALBERTSON'S STORE PRESIDENT OFFICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
