Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Wills v. Howard et al
as 7:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Damien Wills
Defendant:
C Howard, TD Brown, T Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sexton v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2021cv00366
Plaintiff:
Sandy J. Sexton
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sexton v. Wright Medical Technology Inc
as 4:2021cv00971
Plaintiff:
Timothy J Sexton
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McNichols v. Sexton et al
as 0:2021cv00073
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond McNichols
Defendant:
J. Sexton, Tyra Hughes, Sommea James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNichols v. Sexton et al
as 3:2021cv00550
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond McNichols
Defendant:
J. Sexton, Tyra Hughes, Sommea James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teaque v. Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2021cv00960
Plaintiff:
Derrick Teaque
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Mid-State Correctional Facility, Kathy L. Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teaque v. State of New York Department o
as 20-406
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, M. A. Kuzmack, Corrections Lieutenant, S. O'Donnell, Corrections Officer and others
Defendant / Appellee:
K. L. Mullen, Corrections Officer, R. J. Sexton and Ingraham, Corrections Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Derrick Teaque
Dennis Hardeman v. J. Sexton
as 20-55098
Respondent / Appellee:
J. SEXTON, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
DENNIS WAYNE HARDEMAN
Goings et al v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2019cv05552
Defendant:
William Pork, Ambrosio Vegara, Sgt. Botan and others
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Goings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sexton v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv04408
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
David J Sexton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
