Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Rodriquez v. Johnson
as 7:2026cv00284
Plaintiff:
Christino Rodriquez
Defendant:
Terry Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv07786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bowshier v. Griffin et al
as 3:2026cv00269
Plaintiff:
Terry L Bowshier
Defendant:
James N Griffin, C Hernandez, Melissa Upthegrove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Foust v. George et al
as 5:2026cv12562
Plaintiff:
James Ernest Foust
Defendant:
Susan George, Jennifer Zaha, Terry Hailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reville v. City of Buffalo et al
as 1:2026cv01523
Plaintiff:
Brittany E. Reville
Defendant:
City of Buffalo, Terris D. Garner, Mr. Adam M. Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Saunders v. Unlimited Technology Systems, LLC
as 1:2026cv00732
Interested Party:
Glenn Watts, Shannon Ishmael, Martha Matlock and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Saunders
Defendant:
Unlimited Technology Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv05959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MAJORS v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2026cv01556
Plaintiff:
JEFFERICK MAJORS
Defendant:
LT. JACKSON, OFFICER TERRY, OFFICER GROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.