Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Whittle v. Lovette et al
as 2:2026cv01212
Plaintiff:
Christian Whittle
Defendant:
Lovette, Craven, Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whittle v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2026cv00256
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Whittle
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 FMLA: Enforcement
Franklin v. Blanchard et al
as 1:2026cv00091
Plaintiff:
KHALID FRANKLIN
Defendant:
JUDGE GRADY BLANCHARD, GWENDOLYN BOVAN, Bobby L. Christine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANKLIN v. BLANCHARD et al
as 5:2026cv00172
Plaintiff:
KHALID FRANKLIN
Defendant:
JUDGE GRADY BLANCHARD, VETERANS CANTEEN SERVICES, GWENDOLYN BOVAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whittle v. May
as 1:2026cv00441
Petitioner:
Elton Whittle
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields v. McCarter
as 26-40253
Plaintiff:
Marlondos C. Fields, Sr.
Defendant:
Robbi McCarter, Principal, Casey Whittle, Superintendent, M. Helan, Career/Life Skills and others
Riggins et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv03800
Plaintiff:
Floyd Riggins, Payton Lee Jr, Moshe Devere and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WHITTLE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2026cv00040
Plaintiff:
RHONDA LYNN WHITTLE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Participant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Whittle v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) et al
as 4:2026cv00363
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Adam Whittle
Defendant:
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) and Investigator Bret Addison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brook & Whittle, Ltd. v. Schneider
as 3:2026cv00422
Plaintiff:
Brook & Whittle, Ltd.
Defendant:
Cameron Schneider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
