Cases 1 - 10 of 580
Lucas v. Kelley et al
as 9:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
London Lucas and London H. Lucas
Defendant:
Kelley, Dr. Macri, RN Napoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Murphy v. Prescott et al
as 3:2024cv30042
Plaintiff:
Daniel J Murphy
Defendant:
Seon Prescott, Schneider National Carriers, Inc. and Schneider Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Black v. Murphy et al
as 2:2024cv10634
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Black
Defendant:
Michael J. Murphy, Jason Pless, Reginald Van Wulfen and others
v. United States of America
as 1:2024at00173
Defendant:
United States of America
Trustee:
Dolores J. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6532 IRS: Refund of Tax Penalty
Murphy v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Dolores J. Murphy
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6532 IRS: Refund of Tax Penalty
Harel Talasazan v. Robert M. Farrell et al
as 2:2024cv01356
Defendant:
Attorney Poonam Patidar, Robert M. Farrell, Maria R. Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Harel Talasazan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Mitchell
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Judge Susan E. Edlein, Assistant Solicitor Jamie Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brandon Fake, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1113
Plaintiff:
BRANDON L. FAKE, SUSAN B. FAKE and CAITLIN B. FAKE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
McMickle v. Bishop et al
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Gary McMickle
Defendant:
Michael Bishop, Danielle L. Gately, Robert J. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Personal Property)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
