Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Michael Ioane, et al v. County of Santa Clara, et al
as 21-16104
Defendant / Appellee:
BA PROPERTIES, a Delaware Corporation, WILL CARRILLO, J. SHELDON CAPELOTO and others
Plaintiff:
PARADISE SOLUTIONS and SHELLY J. IOANE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. IOANE
Bey v. Stingl et al
as 2:2019cv01636
Defendant:
John T Chisolm, Judge Michelle Havas, Cedric Cornwall and others
Plaintiff:
Solution Asim Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheldon v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2018cv12564
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
Jennifer J Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Marshall v. U.S. Postal Inspection Service
as 17-96
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kerry L. Marshall
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. Postal Inspection Service, Alexander Lazaroff, Chief Postal Inspector, Robert Diaz, Postal Inspector and others
Defendant:
"John Doe"
Rose #235893 v. Washington et al
as 2:2016cv00242
Plaintiff:
Willie Rose #235893
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Jeri-Ann Sherry, Unknown McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gash v. J. Sheldon White, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00923
Plaintiff:
Roy Davis Gash
Defendant:
J. Sheldon White, Inc., James R. Vickery and DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Sheldon et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29639
Plaintiff:
Bonnie J. Sheldon and William B. Sheldon
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sheldon et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv25153
Plaintiff:
Juanita Sheldon and Vincent J. Sheldon
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Filing Error
as 1:2012cv01189
Appellant:
Randy D Shepherd and Cynthia Shepherd
Appellee:
Steve J. Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 3373
Marshall v. Sheldon
as 3:2009cv00420
Plaintiff:
Kerry L. Marshall
Defendant:
David J. Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
