Cases 41 - 50 of 246,353
Alexander v. USA
as 3:2024cv00449
Petitioner:
James Arden Alexander
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Mark v. Brenner et al
as 2:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
Jonathon M Mark
Defendant:
Mark Brenner, Melissa Rodriguez, Tyler Broderick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. State of Montana
as 1:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
James Ronald Wilson
Respondent:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NORMAN WILLIAMS, JR v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
NORMAN WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES BARNACLE, MICHAEL TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Larry Tyler v. Director of the Darlington County Detention Center
as 24-6402
Petitioner:
LARRY JAMES TYLER
Respondent:
DIRECTOR OF THE DARLINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Damond v. City of Rayville
as 24-30289
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Defendant:
City of Rayville, Gary Gilley, Individually & in his Official Capacity, Tyler Wade, in his Individual Capacity & Official Capacity and others
ANR Pipeline Company v. 4.80 Acres, More or Less, In Washington County, Wisconsin et al
as 2:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
ANR Pipeline Company
Defendant:
4.80 Acres, More or Less, In Washington County, Wisconsin, James Merkel and Nancy Merkel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
Markham v. Owusu et al
as 3:2024cv00805
Plaintiff:
James Markham
Defendant:
George Owusu and Sambenny Logistics Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Spencer #529310 v. Ensing et al
as 1:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Spencer #529310
Defendant:
Matthew Ensing, Margaret Greiner, Brian Majerszyk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
