Cases 51 - 60 of 151
Adams v. State of Florida
as 0:2017cv60308
Plaintiff:
James Antonio Adams
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Worthy et al v. The City of Phenix City, Alabama et al
as 3:2017cv00073
Plaintiff:
Thomas F. Worthy , James D. Adams and Willcox-Lumpkin Co., Inc.
Defendant:
The City of Phenix City, Alabama and Redflex Traffic Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Degaris et al v. Monroe County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2016cv00239
Plaintiff:
Brandy Degaris and Jane Doe Plaintiffs 1-12
Defendant:
Monroe County, Mississippi, Monroe County Sheriff's Department, Cecil Cantrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce D. Copeland v. Harold C. Siler et al
as 2:2016cv08864
Defendant:
James E. Adams, Timothy M. Adams, Adams Construction and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce D. Copeland
Adams v. Steele
as 4:2016cv01240
Petitioner:
James C Adams
Respondent:
Troy Steele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Steele
as 4:2016cv00870
Petitioner:
James C Adams
Respondent:
Troy Steele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hilton v. Onslow County, North Carolina et al
as 7:2016cv00279
Plaintiff:
Claude Hilton
Defendant:
Onslow County, North Carolina, Sheriff of Onslow County, Edward Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hilton v. Onslow County, North Carolina et al
as 5:2016ct03184
Plaintiff:
Claude Hilton
Defendant:
Onslow County, North Carolina , Sheriff of Onslow County , Edward Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cheshier, Inc. v. State of Washington et al et al
as 1:2016cv03059
Plaintiff:
J. R. Cheshier, Inc.
Defendant:
State of Washington et al , Gayle M Harthcock , Stephen Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. U.S.CA California Judicial Council
as 4:2016cv00917
Plaintiff:
James D. Adams
Defendant:
U.S.CA California Judicial Council
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
