Cases 81 - 90 of 105
LEONARD v. HARDEN et al
as 1:2010cv01454
Defendant:
ERIC MARC HARDEN and THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEONARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Larson et al v. Minnesota Commission of Corrections et al
as 0:2010cv04288
Plaintiff:
Kevin Herman Larson, James Leonard Blackburn and James Aloysious Wieseler
Defendant:
Minnesota Commission of Corrections, Joan Fabian, Lori Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONNELL v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2010cv00213
Petitioner:
DENNIS CONNELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN YOST, JEFFREY TRIMBATH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James Reynaga Estella v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-72494
Petitioner:
JAMES LEONARD REYNAGA ESTELLA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Sanders v. Astrue
as 3:2010cv00100
Plaintiff:
James Leonard Sanders, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
James Carter, Jr. v. USA
as 10-11895
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES LEONARD CARTER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
USA
Sanders v. Cook et al
as 1:2010cv00717
Plaintiff:
James Leonard Sanders
Defendant:
Jimmi Cook, Robert Eason and James St. Clair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonard v. State of Mississippi
as 5:2010cv00037
Plaintiff:
Chris James Leonard
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Greene v. Georgetown County Detention Center et al
as 6:2009cv03002
Plaintiff:
James Leonard Greene, Jr
Defendant:
Georgetown County Detention Center, Chief Schwarts, Capt Wineglass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
