Cases 1 - 10 of 26
RiggsIn re: Riggs
as 22-1945
Appellant:
In re: GLENN E. RIGGS, JOSEPH J. BAINOR, STANLEY M. BAINOR and others
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
RiggsIn re: Riggs
as 21-2108
Appellant:
RALPH K. BRECHTER, LOUIS F. INDELICATO, JON L. CLOW and others
Appellee:
ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Lu v. Clarke, et al
as 21-1245
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH STANTON, CAROL A. MICI, MATTHEW DIVRIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRIEDRICH LU
CLARKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv06513
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES R CLARKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lu v. Clarke et al
as 1:2020cv12010
Defendant:
James R Clarke, Charles W Rankin, James L Sultan and others
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv65535
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES R CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Clark
as 1:2019cv03765
Plaintiff:
Tracy Mitchell
Defendant:
James R. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clark v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv02417
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
James R Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00282
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James R. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv03833
Plaintiff:
Gloria J. Clark and James R. Clark
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Gynecare Worldwide and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
