Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
James Epps, Sr. v. Fox News Network LLC
as 26-2129
Plaintiff:
JAMES RAY EPPS, SR.
Defendant:
FOX NEWS NETWORK LLC
Schwartz et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 4:2026cv03887
Plaintiff:
Denise Schwartz, Dominic Naugle, Paula Meng and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thompson v. Warden, FCI Texarkana
as 5:2026cv00060
Petitioner:
James Ray Thompson
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Eldreth v. The City Of Houston Texas et al
as 4:2026cv02883
Defendant:
The City Of Houston Texas, Harris County Texas, AC Espinal and others
Plaintiff:
James Ray Eldreth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ray v. Bitez et al
as 3:2026cv00374
Defendant:
Routedamaker, Bitez, Hall and others
Plaintiff:
William James Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Ignatovich
as 26-5034
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TIMOTHY JAMES RAY IGNATOVICH
Ray v. Taylor et al
as 3:2026cv00101
Plaintiff:
William James Ray and William Ray
Defendant:
Jerome Taylor, Benjamin, Jaqueline Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ugarte v. CRST Specialized Transportation Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv01296
Plaintiff:
Luis Rodriguez Ugarte
Defendant:
CRST Specialized Transportation Inc. doing business as Specialized Transportation Inc. and James Ray Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Meyers v. State of Nevada
as 3:2025cv00730
Petitioner:
James Ray Myers Jr.
Respondent:
State of Nevada and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
