Cases 11 - 20 of 122
Jeremy Jones v. South Atlantic Galvinizing
as 23-1389
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTH ATLANTIC GALVINIZING, RUSTY WILLIAMS and BRIAN SOLOIS
GIBBS v. PRETORIUS et al
as 1:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND LEE GIBBS
Defendant:
TRICIA PRETORIUS, CARRIE SIPICH, KATIE MCMAHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. POBORSKY
as 3:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
SHAWN L. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COII STEPHEN POBORSKY, CO1 BRADLEY MORGAN, JR., CO11 C.A. NEYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jones v. Coree et al
as 1:2022cv01119
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jones
Defendant:
D. Coree, J. Brown, Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRIDGEWATER v. JONES et al
as 1:2022cv01322
Plaintiff:
MILLION BRIDGEWATER
Defendant:
JEREMY JONES, PRETOURIOUS and MEDICAL STAFF AT IYC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeremy Jones v. Nicole Fedo, et al
as 22-2239
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeremy Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
Nicole Fedo, Case Manager, Individual and Official and Heather Kensey, Unit Manager, Individual and Official Capacities
Jones v. South Atlantic Galvinizing et al
as 6:2022cv01152
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jones
Defendant:
South Atlantic Galvinizing, Rusty Williams and Brian Solois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BOYD v. MILLER et al
as 1:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
DEREK BOYD
Defendant:
BRANDON MILLER, TRICIA PRETORIUS, JEREMY JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEST v. PRETORIUS et al
as 1:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
MARK WEST
Defendant:
TRICIA PRETORIUS, CHASSITY PLUMMER, ALLYSSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Ceinski, Jr.
as 8:2022cv00231
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jones
Defendant:
David Ceinski, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
