Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rogers v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv00927
Plaintiff:
Betty Rogers
Defendant:
United States of America, Lyn Schneider, Alicia Stefanik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Owens v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv01637
Defendant:
3M Company, The, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, Du Pont De Nemours Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Joe Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Margaret Rudin v. Nevada Dept. of Corrections, et al.
as 2:2015cv02503
Defendant:
R. Aranas, J. G. Cox, Fergeson and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret Rudin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance Company et al
as 6:2015cv00043
Plaintiff:
Joe Owens
Defendant:
Adam Lee Tate and Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Owens v. McCallister
as 3:2014cv00529
Respondent:
Gerald McCallister
Petitioner:
Tommy Joe Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Lott v. Lewis et al
as 3:2012cv00163
Plaintiff:
Elijah Damond Lott
Defendant:
Tyrone Lewis and Joe Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Jones, et al
as 11-6284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MARK STEPHENS
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director, DOC, GENESE MCCOY, Medical Services Administrator, DONNA LAYMON, Warden and others
Timothy Owens v. Secretary Department of Correc, et al
as 11-11104
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY JOE OWENS
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Billups v. Hinds Medical Dept.
as 3:2011cv00054
Plaintiff:
Charlie Junior Billups
Defendant:
Joe Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
