Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Zastrow et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company) et al
as 2:2025cv11921
Plaintiff:
Barbara Jean Zastrow, Sherwood Wright, Markette Irene Williams and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., AMEREX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Robertson v. City of Newark, Ohio et al
as 2:2025cv00600
Plaintiff:
J Martin Robertson
Defendant:
City of Newark, Ohio, Mayor Jeff Hall, Tim Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. WAYNE et al
as 3:2025cv00574
Plaintiff:
BOBBY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOE PAUL, ELIZABETH POWELL and WREN RENEE WAYNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
PRICE v. PAUL
as 5:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STEVEN PRICE
Defendant:
JOE PAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv01240
Petitioner:
Joe Paul Martinez
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Kris Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perry v. Hogg et al
as 4:2022cv00862
Plaintiff:
Gregory Michael Perry
Defendant:
Leonard Hogg, Amanda Rodgers, Chris Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EIPCa, et al v. Shirley Weber, et al
as 21-56061
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA, INC., JAMES P. BRADLEY, AJA SMITH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIRLEY WEBER, California Secretary of State, ROB BONTA, California Attorney General, GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of the State of California and others
Election Integrity Project California, Inc. et al v. Alex Padilla et al
as 2:2021cv00032
Defendant:
Dean Logan, Deborah R. Cooper, Joe Paul Gonzalez and others
Plaintiff:
Buzz Patterson, Greg Raths, Election Integrity Project California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
