Cases 1 - 10 of 13
FREEMAN III v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv66757
Plaintiff:
JACK FREEMAN III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00860
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Snow v. Jack Freeman Trucking Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01049
Plaintiff:
David Snow
Defendant:
Jack Freeman Trucking Co., Inc. and Wieslaw Wojdyla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Obamas et al v. Nance et al
as 1:2014cv00029
Plaintiff:
Jack Freeman
Defendant:
Melvin Nance, Tiera Pickering, Jennifer Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Budnick et al
as 1:2014cv00018
Plaintiff:
Jack Freeman
Defendant:
Christopher Budnick, Joe Page, III, Marvin Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS DELIVERY COMPANY, INC. et al v. MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD.
as 2:2012cv07186
Plaintiff:
EVANS DELIVERY COMPANY, INC. , LIGHTNING TRANSPORTATION, INC. , FALCON TRANSPORT, INC. and others
Defendant:
MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD. v. EVANS DELIVERY COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv05595
Plaintiff:
MITSUI O.S.K. LINES, LTD.
Defendant:
EVANS DELIVERY COMPANY, INC. , LIGHTNING TRANSPORTATION, INC. , LAND TRANSPORTATION and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702
Arp et al v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00770
Plaintiff:
David Arp , Robert Barker , Billy Barnett and others
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation and Plan Administrator, Maytag Corporation Employees Retirement Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Freeman v. Kadien
as 11-353
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jack Freeman
Respondent - Appellee:
Gregory Kadien
Freeman v. White et al
as 5:2010cv00259
Plaintiff:
Jack Freeman
Defendant:
David White, B Corley, Mark Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
