Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Baldwin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, Inc.
as 0:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
James Baldwin
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
James Baldwin et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv00142
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Chemguard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James Baldwin and Teresa Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Baldwin v. Dickerson
as 9:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Ira James Baldwin
Defendant:
Daniel Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldwin v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01156
Plaintiff:
James Baldwin
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bw Diversity -Breach of Warranty
Jones #235079 v. Fager et al
as 1:2023cv00471
Plaintiff:
Walter Lee Jones-Bey #235079 and Walter Lee Jones #235079
Defendant:
John Fager, Kyle Traptow, James Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BALDWIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20300
Plaintiff:
CAMERON JAMES BALDWIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BALDWIN v. SUPERINTENDENT, SCI ALBION et al
as 2:2021cv01520
Petitioner:
JAMES BALDWIN
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, SCI ALBION, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baldwin v. Noeth
as 6:2020cv06989
Respondent:
Joseph Noeth
Petitioner:
James Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
