Cases 21 - 30 of 257
United States v. James Hanapel
as 23-2653
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
James Dean Hanapel
Wilson v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice
as 2:2023cv00055
Petitioner:
James Dean Wilson
Respondent:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramos v. Dean et al
as 2:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
Rae Ramos
Defendant:
James Dean, Richard Chvala, Naomi McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company v. Rose Miramontes et al
as 2:2022cv09213
Defendant:
Rose Miramontes and James Dean
Interpleader:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
DeRocha v. Dewitt Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv01344
Plaintiff:
Matthew DeRocha
Defendant:
Dewitt Police Department, Jared Petrie, Justin Baum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. MOSLEY et al
as 5:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
JAMES DEAN JONES
Defendant:
SHANNON MOSLEY and PRIYANKA BANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Fountain v. Raymond Peterson, et al
as 22-13672
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMES DEAN FOUNTAIN
Defendant / Appellant:
RAYMOND PETERSON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of the Clinch County Sheriffs Office and JAMES SMITH
USA v. James Cloud
as 22-30173
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES DEAN CLOUD
James Kendrick v. FBI
as 22-5271
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Dean Kendrick
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Dean v. Hoover Treated Wood Products Inc
as 4:2022cv00810
Plaintiff:
James Dean
Defendant:
Hoover Treated Wood Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
