Cases 1 - 10 of 21
National Labor Relations Board v. Smith
as 3:2023mc00024
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
James Garland Smith
BARD v. BARD et al
as 3:2021cv00185
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G. BARD
Defendant:
PATRICK BARD, JOHN BLACK, ALICE DOHERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GARLAND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv11285
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ward v. Beesley et al
as 1:2020cv00255
Plaintiff:
James Garland Ward
Defendant:
John Doe, H. Beesley and Mike Ezell
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLEDSOE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv83568
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES GARLAND BLEDSOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Doe 1 et al v. Chiquita Brands International, Inc. et al
as 9:2018cv80248
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 , Jane Doe #1 , John Doe #3 and others
Defendant:
Chiquita Brands International, Inc., Moe Corporations 1-10, Moes 11-25 and others
Movant:
John E. Hall, Eric Holder, Jr., James Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Garland et al
as 6:2017cv00106
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Richard Bernard Garland, Unknown Spouse of Richard Bern Garland, Richard James Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Garland v. Dart et al
as 1:2016cv03785
Plaintiff:
James Garland
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Superintendent Walsh, Division 10 Health Care Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finneyfrock v. Graham et al
as 1:2015cv03873
Petitioner:
James Garland Finneyfrock
Respondent:
Richard J. Graham, Jr. and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johns v. Rose
as 1:2014cv00080
Plaintiff:
James Garland Johns
Defendant:
Fergison and Glenda Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
