Cases 1 - 10 of 10
HAGGERTY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12989
Plaintiff:
DEAN JAMES HAGGERTY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Parker v. Haggerty
as 2:2022cv00426
Plaintiff:
Angela R. Parker
Defendant:
James M. Haggerty and Matthew James Haggerty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Arceo v. City of Roseville et al
as 2:2020at01156
Defendant:
City of Roseville, Daniel Timoney, CEP - America - California DBA Vituity Hospitalists and others
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Arceo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arceo v. City of Roseville et al
as 2:2020cv02334
Defendant:
Ashley Joel Pilgrim, City of Roseville, Daniel Timoney and others
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Arceo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
George Kocher v. Borough of Kingston, et al
as 19-2872
Defendant / Appellee:
BOROUGH OF KINGSTON and MAYOR JAMES HAGGERTY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE KOCHER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Robert Annabel, II v. Jorg Erichsen, et al
as 17-1542
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant - Appellee:
JORG ERICHSEN, BROWN, Warden, Corrections Officer, ANTWAN ODEN, Corrections Officer and others
Defendant:
[UNKNOWN] ROBBINSON, Corrections Officer
Haggerty v. USA
as 1:2016cv00168
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Haggerty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cheshier v. State of Washington et al
as 1:2014cv03130
Petitioner:
Jetson Reed Cheshier
Respondent:
State of Washington, Yakima County, James Haggerty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Haggerty v. American Optical Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv11979
Plaintiff:
James Haggerty, Sr.
Defendant:
American Optical Corporation, American Standard, Inc., Ametek, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
