Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Miller et al v. Marshall County, Indiana et al
as 3:2019cv00842
Defendant:
Marshall County, Indiana and MARSHALL COUNTY SHERIFF
Plaintiff:
JAMES MILLER, CODY DEERY, JAMES RODGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Russell et al
as 4:2016cv00149
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Da'Von Reynolds
Defendant:
Harry Russell, Ronald Helms, Byington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Edwards et al
as 4:2015cv00028
Plaintiff:
James Rodgers
Defendant:
Edwards, Jones, Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shwartzmiller et al v. Brown et al
as 3:2013cv01582
Plaintiff:
Dean A. Shwartzmiller, Larry Cates, Darrin Gasper and others
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Martin Hoshino, California Prisoner Health Care Receivership Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Rodgers v. Randy Pfister
as 11-3145
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES RODGERS
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDY PFISTER
Uloho v. Rodgers et al
as 2:2010cv03356
Plaintiff:
Mary Uloho
Defendant:
James Rodgers and Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodgers v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2010cv00474
Plaintiff:
James Rodgers
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tracy v. Seattle Police Department et al
as 2:2010cv01443
Plaintiff:
Gerald B. Tracy
Defendant:
Seattle Police Department, Federal Bureau of Investigations, Washington State Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2010cv00576
Petitioner:
James Rodgers
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodgers v. State of Alabama
as 1:2009cv00732
Petitioner:
James Rodgers
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
