Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Burrow v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02881
Plaintiff:
James Roy Burrow
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin et al v. Shelby Transport, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Stacey Lynne Martin and Daniel Joe Martin
Defendant:
Shelby Transport, Inc. and James Roy Frantz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
James Karklin v. O'Bell Winn, et al
as 24-1090
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROY KARKLIN
Defendant:
O'BELL T. WINN, GARY MINIARD, CARROLL WALKER and others
Cooksey v. Seguir et al
as 1:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
James Roy Cooksey
Defendant:
Aida Vallestero Yana Seguir, Andrew Seguir, Frederich Bernard Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooksey v. Port Arthur Police Department
as 1:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
James Roy Cooksey
Defendant:
Port Arthur Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooksey v. Port Arthur Police Department
as 1:2023cv00271
Petitioner:
James Roy Cooksey
Respondent:
Port Arthur Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jacoby v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv04027
Plaintiff:
James Roy Jacoby
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections and Missouri Department of Corrections Food Service Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitfield v. Sheriff Parnell McNamara
as 6:2022cv01271
Petitioner:
James Roy Whitfield, Jr.
Respondent:
TDCJ Director Bobby Lumpkin and Sheriff Parnell McNamara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Karklin v. Winn et al
as 2:2022cv11970
Plaintiff:
James Roy Karklin
Defendant:
O'Bell Winn, Gary Miniard, Carroll Walker and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
