Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Woody v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2021pq01634
Plaintiff:
JAMES WOODY
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron USA, Inc. and others
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woody v. Target Corporation et al
as 3:2021cv00540
Plaintiff:
James Woody
Defendant:
Target Corporation and NB-BTMC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowles v Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 7:2020cv00112
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
James Woody Bowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Clouatre v. Matranga et al
as 3:2020cv00479
Defendant:
Brett Cavaliere, 123 Insurance Company, Thomas L Carpenter and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Clouatre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woody v. USA
as 3:2015cv00719
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Woody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jones et al v. City of Carthage, MO et al
as 3:2013cv05067
Plaintiff:
Douglas L Jones and Regina R Jones
Defendant:
City of Carthage, MO , Carthage Police Department , Greg Dagnan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woody v. Receivable Management Services
as 5:2011cv00579
Plaintiff:
James Woody
Defendant:
Receivable Management Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv05930
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Peter Eriksen, et al v. Ronal Serpas, et al
as 09-35841
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER ERIKSEN, a single man and MARY ERIKSEN, a single woman
Defendant - Appellee:
RONAL SERPAS, Chief, Washington State Patrol, KITTITAS COUNTY, a municipal corporation, CITY OF CLE ELUM, a municipal corporation and others
Eriksen et al v. Serpas et al
as 2:2009cv00082
Plaintiff:
Peter H Eriksen and Mary Eriksen
Defendant:
Ronal Serpas, Kittitas County, Cle Elum, City of and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
