Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Beeson v. Picard et al
as 6:2026cv02327
Plaintiff:
Jamie Scott Beeson
Defendant:
Trevor Picard and Sheriff Mark Garber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Corcoran v. Lyles et al
as 5:2025cv01133
Plaintiff:
Jamie Scott Corcoran and J C
Defendant:
Molli Lyles, Officer Kurkhart, Nurse Rashanda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brock v. Eller
as 3:2025cv00275
Petitioner:
Jamie Scott Brock
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chappell v. Marshall County, Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00696
Defendant:
Dekalb County, Alabama, Alabama Department of Human Resources, Nancy T Buckner and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Coit Chappell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRIDRIKSSON v. VILLEGAS et al
as 1:2021cv00084
Defendant:
SERGEANT JANE DOE, ALACHUA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, LT JAMIE SCOTT and others
Plaintiff:
CHANCE BROGAN FRIDRIKSSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02199
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jamie Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEDDLE v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 2:2017cv00219
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Petitioner:
JAMIE SCOTT WEDDLE
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VACHON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2015cv00112
Plaintiff:
JAMIE SCOTT VACHON
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Sisler v. Sisler et al
as 4:2013cv00426
Plaintiff:
Sharon Lee Sisler
Defendant:
Jamie Scott Sisler and Elizabeth Kay Sisler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
