Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Sutton v. Doe et al
as 1:2018cv00520
Plaintiff: Joshua Lamont Sutton
Defendant: Jane (1) Doe, John Doe and Jane (2) Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maples v. Doe et al
as 1:2018cv00510
Plaintiff: Ryan Maples
Defendant: Jane (1) Doe, Jane (2) Doe and Jane (3) Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donis Denby v. Bosco, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-40598
Plaintiff - Appellant: DONIS LEMOND DENBY
Defendant - Appellee: FNU BOSCO, Warden, FNU HUNT, Correction Officer, FNU RUPERT, Warden and others
Fuentes v. Rupert et al
as 6:2016cv00778
Plaintiff: Johnny Fuentes
Defendant: John Rupert, Jeffery Richardson, Brennan Shay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noyola v. Doe et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv05041
Plaintiff: Mario Noyola
Defendant: Jane Doe, Jacqueline L Fluaitt, Ramona Cravens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2016cv00007
Plaintiff: ANDREW JONES
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , HOPE VILLAGE, INC. , SHEILA ADEGBIE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nyah Tchami William et al v. AES Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00343
Plaintiff: Nyah Tchami William, Business Group 4, Business Group 2 and others
Defendant: AES Sonel, Actis Capital LLP and AES Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryant v. Good et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00101
Plaintiff: Keiron Wayne Bryant
Defendant: FNU Good, FNU Ciolli, K Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv01901
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2178
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?