Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Tom Clowers v. Kelly Crandduck, et al
as 16-4367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tom Clowers
Defendant - Appellee:
Kelly Crandduck, Jason Wood, Charles "Chuck" Snider and others
Wood et al v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv00607
Plaintiff:
Jason Wood and Roger Barrows
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation and Dolgencorp L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Dollar General Corp. Motor Oil Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
as 4:2016md02709
Plaintiff:
Robert Oren , Nicholas Meyer , Janine Harvey and others
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation , Dolgencorp, LLC , DG Retail LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Wood et al v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as NYN/3:16-cv-00534
Plaintiff:
Jason Wood and Roger Barrows
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation and Dolgencorp, L.L.C.
Wood et al v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv00534
Plaintiff:
Jason Wood and Roger Barrows
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation and Dolgencorp, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brothers et al v Warrior Energy Services Corp
as 5:2016cv00272
Plaintiff:
Ron Brothers , Kalen Hein , Elijah Hill and others
Defendant:
Warrior Energy Services Corp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wood et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00545
Plaintiff:
Karen Wood and Jason Wood
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clowers v. Cradduck et al
as 5:2015cv05260
Plaintiff:
Tom G. Clowers
Defendant:
Kelly Cradduck, Jason Wood, Charles "Chuck" Snider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Quintana
as 5:2015cv00022
Petitioner:
Jason Woods
Respondent:
Francisco Quintana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Parrish v. Chapman et al
as 1:2014cv00099
Plaintiff:
Ken D. Parrish
Defendant:
Arvil Chapman, Derrick D. Schofield, Jason Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
