Cases 1 - 10 of 66
MILLER et al v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AUTHORITIES et al
as 2:2022cv03639
Plaintiff:
STAMAR RICHARD MILLER, JAHMAD LOCKITT, BRIAN LOWRIE and others
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AUTHORITIES and WARDEN L. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF MAINE
as 1:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Petitioner:
JEFFREY WILLIAMS
Respondent:
STATE OF MAINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Padgett v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00016
Defendant:
Arnaldo Mercado, Mary Cooks, Christy Vincent and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Keith Padgett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padgett v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv01021
Defendant:
Arnaldo Mercado, Mary Cooks, Christy Vincent and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Keith Padgett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Tellez
as 4:2018cv04167
Respondent:
Heriberto H. Tellez
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Murrie
as 4:2018cv03427
Defendant:
Daniel Murrie
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffrey Williams v. Brad Livingston, Executive Dir, et al
as 18-20408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE and JANICE ULMER, Administrative Assistant IV of the Sex Offenders Rehabilitation Program
Williams v. Murrie
as 1:2018cv00292
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Williams
Defendant:
Daniel Murrie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Clarke
as 2:2017cv00617
Petitioner:
Jeffrey William Smith
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Davis
as 4:2017cv00387
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Williams
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
