Cases 1 - 10 of 119
Matilda Turner v. Micah Ennis
as 24-1189
Plaintiff:
MATILDA TURNER
Defendant:
MICAH ENNIS, Rowan County School Director, ROWAN COUNTY COURTHOUSE, DAYMARK RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. and others
JOHNSON v. PROSPECT MEDICA HOLDINGS et al
as 2:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
THEMA JOHNSON
Defendant:
PROSPECT MEDICA HOLDINGS, SAMUEL SANG-BUM LEE, JIM BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TURNER v. ENNIS et al
as 1:2023cv00737
Defendant:
JIM BROWN, MICAH ENNIS, ROAWN COUNTY COURTHOUSE and others
Plaintiff:
MATILDA TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Sinclair v. Schaber et al
as 2:2023cv01166
Petitioner:
Alexander Sinclair
Respondent:
Gordon D Schaber, John Winn, Winston Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Annucci et al
as 1:2022cv10089
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Jim Brown
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci and Tryece Drake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jim Brown Video, Inc. v. State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 5:2022cv05111
Plaintiff:
Jim Brown Video, Inc.
Defendant:
State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Brown et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv01896
Plaintiff:
Jim Brown, Maria Brown, David Emery and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Brown et al v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv06114
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lowanda Brown and Jim Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dietrich v. Brock et al
as 1:2020cv01307
Defendant:
Jim Brown, Jerry Littlefield and Rich Brock
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Dietrich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy McIlwain, I v. James Brown
as 20-55424
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY JOSEPH MCILWAIN I and TIMOTHY JOSEPH MCILWAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES NATHANIEL BROWN, AKA Jim Brown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
