Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Orendorf v. Office of Behavioral Health et al
as 1:2021cv01000
Defendant:
James Purviance, Office of Behavioral Health, Forensic Community Bases Services and others
Plaintiff:
Trenton H Orendorf and Trenton Harrison Orendorf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GATEWOOD v. LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2018cv01059
Plaintiff:
MARQUICE GATEWOOD
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, CHERYL STEBERGER, JENKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Bradfield v. Core Civic, Inc et al
as 1:2017cv01232
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Bradfield
Defendant:
Core Civic, Inc, Kimberly Allen, FNU Tyus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Conmed, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00507
Plaintiff:
Cyle J. Moore
Defendant:
Conmed, Inc. , Conmed, LLC , Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Daniels v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2016cv02992
Defendant:
The City Of New York, John/Jane Doe GMDC Warden, John/Jane Doe GMDC Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Strizic v. NorthWestern Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv00016
Plaintiff:
Daniel (Dan) J. Strizic
Defendant:
NorthWestern Corporation and John & Jane Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Combat Zone Corp v. John/Jane Does 1-7
as 3:2012cv02550
Plaintiff:
Combat Zone Corp
Defendant:
John/Jane Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Outlaw v. John/Jane Doe 1-7
as 1:2010cv01021
Plaintiff:
Lee Outlaw
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe 1-7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lang v. Tauzin et al
as 3:2010cv00206
Plaintiff:
David Andrew Lang
Defendant:
Julie E. Tauzin and John/Jane Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Schildhorn v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2007cv01419
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Schildhorn, Jeffrey Schildhorn and Jeffrey Schildhorn
Defendant:
The City of New York, Robert Titza, Victor Candela and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
