Cases 1 - 10 of 25
SANTIAGO v. AMERICAN TEXTILE COMPANY, INCORPORATED
as 2:2023cv01811
Plaintiff:
JOHN SANTIAGO
Defendant:
AMERICAN TEXTILE COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
STREET v. SANTIAGO et al
as 1:2021cv00941
Plaintiff:
LOMMIA FAYE STREET
Defendant:
JOHN SANTIAGO, TRAVIS J NELLIS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SANTIAGO BARROSO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv42430
Plaintiff:
ROGER JOHN SANTIAGO BARROSO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIOS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv09975
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN SANTIAGO RIOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANTIAGO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv71168
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANTIAGO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv60359
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diego v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019cv00743
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
John Santiago Diego
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mopecha v. Maricopa County Sheriff et al
as 2:2018cv02492
Defendant:
John Santiago, Mesa Police Department, Maricopa County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff:
Taboh Mopecha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKnight v. Semple et al
as 3:2018cv00696
Plaintiff:
Jamar McKnight
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Monica Rinaldi, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKnight v. Semple et al
as 3:2018cv00456
Plaintiff:
Jamar McKnight
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Monica Rinaldi, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
