Cases 11 - 20 of 64
SMITH v. ATF SUPERVISOR JOHN/JANE DOE et al
as 2:2022cv03877
Plaintiff:
MALIK SMITH
Defendant:
ATF SUPERVISOR JOHN/JANE DOE, KYLE M. RAGUZ, JOHN SCHMIDT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHMIDT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14463
Plaintiff:
CHRIS JOHN SCHMIDT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clervrain et al v. Krebs et al
as 4:2022cv04047
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Niva Guerrier
Defendant:
Shantel Krebs, Kristi Noem, Jason Ravnsborg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Denny v. Schmidt
as 3:2020cv03239
Plaintiff:
Vicki J Denny
Defendant:
John Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
SCHMIDT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv52348
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN SCHMIDT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wosmek et al v. Schmidt et al
as 0:2019cv00086
Defendant:
Stanley Schmidt, Steven Schmidt, Jane L. Schmidt Revocable Trust and others
Plaintiff:
John Schmidt, Katherine Rippentrop and Jody Wosmek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sansevero et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11872
Plaintiff:
Patricia Santanastaso, Terry Simmons, Samir Suero and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Smith et al v. Kellogg Company et al
as 1:2018cv01341
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bouchard, Alice Donovan, Frank Pimental and others
Defendant:
Kellogg Company and Kellogg Sales Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hines v. Islam et al
as 4:2018cv02741
Defendant:
Warren R Worthy, Muhamud K. Islam, John Schmidt and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Barnard Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
