Cases 1 - 10 of 13
CAPONE et al v. LIBERTY MUTUAL PERSONAL INSURANCE CO. et al
as 2:2023cv05182
Plaintiff:
LAUREN CAPONE and JONATHAN MURPHY
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL PERSONAL INSURANCE CO., LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. doing business as "LIBERTY MUTUAL" and JOHN, JANE, AND/OR COPRORATE DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
HOLMES v. WAGNER et al
as 2:2022cv00490
Plaintiff:
HENRY JAMES HOLMES
Defendant:
OCCUPANCY MANAGER LAVERNE WAGNER, OPPUPANCY SPECIALIST JONATHAN MURPHY, NINA BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
MURPHY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv95255
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy et al v. Bunge North America Inc et al
as 4:2020cv00890
Defendant:
Bunge North America Inc and Kris Tillie
Plaintiff:
Vincent Banister and Jonathan Murphy doing business as Murphy Trucking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alberts v. Murphy
as 3:2020cv03041
Defendant:
Officer Jonathan Murphy and Jonathon Murphy
Plaintiff:
Christopher Carl Alberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. City Of Prichard et al
as 1:2019cv00992
Defendant:
City Of Prichard, Jonathan Murphy, City of Prichard, Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailer v. Murphy et al
as 1:2019cv00808
Defendant:
Super Service Holdings, LLC and Jonathan Murphy
Plaintiff:
Ronny H Bailer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
United States of America v. Murphy
as 2:2011mj30322
Defendant:
Jonathan Murphy
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Murphy
as 2:2011mj30322
Defendant:
Jonathan Murphy
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
