Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Brown v. McConkey, et al
as 26-1318
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BROWN
Defendant:
JONATHAN SMITH, MATT SAWYER, DON BABBIN, Chief, Ossipee Police Department and others
Interested Party:
LYNN M. CLARKE
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv00260
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Okere v. Smith et al
as 3:2026cv00143
Plaintiff:
Joy Okere
Defendant:
Jonathan Smith, The Kenan Advantage Group Inc and Transvac LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SMITH v. JONES et al
as 2:2025cv04458
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN SMITH
Defendant:
BRIAN JONES and DEWITT TRANSPORTATION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle
Smith v. Antioch et al
as 3:2025cv05572
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Smith
Defendant:
City of Antioch and Chief Steven Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Zhicheng Zhen et al v. DraftKings, Inc.
as 3:2025cv04618
Plaintiff:
Zhicheng Zhen and Jonathan Smith
Defendant:
DraftKings, Inc.
Interested Party:
FanDuel, Inc. and PrizePicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Brown v. McConkey et al
as 1:2025cv00077
Plaintiff:
Steven Brown
Defendant:
Mark McConkey, Jonathan Smith, Matt Sawyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company v. Security Walls, LLC et al
as 1:2025cv01385
Plaintiff:
Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Security Walls, LLC and Jonathan Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith v. Gentry et al
as 1:2024cv00956
Defendant:
FNU Yates and FNU Gentry
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
