Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Jones v. Kindrick et al
as 3:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
Virginia Jones
Defendant:
Joseph Willie Kindrick, Jr., Mid-South Farmers Cooperative Incorporated, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
US v. Joseph Willie, Jr.
as 22-4621
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH WILLIE, JR., a/k/a Joe Willie, a/k/a Joe Mafia
Willis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv06859
Plaintiff:
Joseph Willis and Joseph E. Willis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WILLIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv34185
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WILLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. Evans et al
as 4:2018cv00517
Defendant:
J Camille Bennett and Joseph Willie Evans, III
Plaintiff:
David Matthew Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaca v. Riverside Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2018cv01433
Plaintiff:
Marcos Vaca
Defendant:
Riverside Sheriff Department, Mario Perez, Leonardo Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 1:2016cv02564
Plaintiff:
Joseph Willis
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Fontenot v. Willis et al
as 2:2016cv00395
Plaintiff:
Anthony Fontenot
Defendant:
Joseph Willis, William Deshotel, Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Thomas Willi
as 15-15036
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS JOSEPH WILLI
LEWIS et al v. PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
as 1:2015cv01328
Plaintiff:
ROGER JOSEPH WILLIS, ELY CHEN, GEORGE J. BARR and others
Defendant:
ESTATE OF NICHOLAS L. AMABILE, ESTATE OF DANIEL H. COURTNEY, ESTATE OF LAWRENCE D. OLBRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
