Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Stewart v. Gabriel Brothers, Inc.
as 3:2026cv00293
Plaintiff:
Kelly Stewart
Defendant:
Gabriel Brothers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stewart v. Weischedel, et al.
as 26-3081
Plaintiff:
KELLY STEWART
Defendant:
KELSEY WEISCHEDEL, SHEILA KOLAR, Municiple Judge, KASIA HARVEY and others
STEWART v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv02952
Plaintiff:
KELLY STEWART
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA LLC and PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stewart v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2025cv00242
Plaintiff:
Kellie Stewart
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stewart v. Weischedel et al
as 1:2025cv00117
Plaintiff:
Kelly Stewart
Defendant:
Kelsey Weischedel, Kasia Harvey, Jessica McFarren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chiappe v. Stewart
as 2:2024cv03179
Plaintiff:
David Joseph Chiappe
Defendant:
Li Wan Ting and Kelly Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. Christopher Gilbert
as 24-6398
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER GILBERT, REANNE KEGLEY, Counselor at ROSP, AMEE DUNCAN, Counselor at ROSP and others
Stewart v. Gabriel Brothers, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Kelly Stewart
Defendant:
Gabriel Brothers, Inc. d/b/a Gabe's and Gabriel Brothers, Inc. doing business as Gabe's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Stewart v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02765
Plaintiff:
Kelly Stewart
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Paul Younkin , III v. Eric Tice, et al
as 21-2847
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL C. YOUNKIN, III
Defendant:
SUPERINTENANT ERIC TICE, MEDICAL DIRECTOR BRIAN HYDE, LICENSED PHYSICIAN B. SMUCKER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.