Cases 1 - 10 of 12
William Davis, Jr. v. Walmart Inc.
as 26-2177
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAVIS, JR.
Defendant:
WALMART INC., WALMART SUPER CENTER, CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH and others
Davis v. WalMart Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv00037
Plaintiff:
William Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
WalMart Inc., Walmart Super Center, City of Virginia Beach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Chandler v. Templeton et al
as 3:2026cv00021
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Chandler
Defendant:
Branden Templeton, John Doe and City of Gallatin, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chandler v. USA
as 1:2025cv00199
Plaintiff:
Kenneth M. Chandler
Defendant:
USA
Interested Party:
CASE MANAGER FOR Kenneth M. Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Chambers
as 3:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Kenneth William Chandler
Defendant:
Brian Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Caldwell et al
as 3:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Kenneth William Chandler
Defendant:
Warden Caldwell, Grier and Ms. McAfee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sarnacki v. Golden, et al
as 14-1414
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON SARNACKI, derivatively on behalf of Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL F. GOLDEN, JOHN A. KELLY, BARRY M. MONHEIT and others
Wilder v. Bunting, et al
as 2:2012cv00379
Plaintiff:
Willie T. Wilder, Jr.
Defendant:
Diane Bunting, R. Scott Morgan, Jacqueline Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sarnacki v. Golden et al
as 3:2011cv30009
Plaintiff:
Aaron Sarnacki
Defendant:
Michael F Golden , John A Kelly , Barry M Monheit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sarnacki v. Golden et al
as 2:2010cv02316
Plaintiff:
Aaron Sarnacki
Defendant:
Michael F Golden , John A Kelly , Barry M Monheit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
