Cases 11 - 20 of 25
BROWN v. BROWN et al
as 2:2016cv06707
Petitioner:
MARTIN BROWN
Respondent:
KATHRYN BROWN, ERIN BOYLE and NEAL GOLDSTEIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown et al v. Kia Motors America, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00755
Plaintiff:
Stephen Brown and Kathryn Brown
Defendant:
Kia Motors America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Agyapong et al v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv06576
Plaintiff:
Kwaku Agyapong , Douglas Antley , Raymond Austin and others
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown et al v. Mohamed et al (PLR1)
as 1:2016cv00098
Plaintiff:
Peter Brown and Kathryn Brown
Defendant:
Hassan A. Mohamed, Swift Transportation Services, LLC and Esurance Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Orozco #260141 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv02026
Plaintiff:
Luis Felipe Orozco
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon Health Incorporated, Michael Hegmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman # 229191 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01302
Plaintiff:
James Ward Chapman, III
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon Health Incorporated, Michael Hegmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv02657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ferguson #235832 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01207
Plaintiff:
Harold Edwin Ferguson
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon Health Incorporated, Michael Hegmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv04489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00893
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
