Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Davis v. Osborne
as 3:2011cv00523
Petitioner:
Kenneth C Davis
Respondent:
David Osborne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Epps et al
as 3:2011cv00324
Petitioner:
Kenneth L. Davis
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Michael A. Wilson and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Barton et al
as 3:2010cv01237
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Davis
Defendant:
Joel Barton, David Scott and Charles Shuff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Bledsoe
as 3:2009cv02172
Petitioner:
Kenneth M. Davis
Respondent:
Bledsoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv01713
Petitioner:
Kenneth Wayne Davis
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey, Harley Lappin and Blake Davies
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Davis, Kenneth T. v. Senator, et al
as 08-7019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth T. Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
Senator, Honorable of New Jersey, Individually and In his official capacity and his successor, Governor, Honorable of New Jersey, Individually and In his official capacity and his successor, Karen Brown, Probation Officer and others
Davis v. Lay et al
as 5:2008cv00016
Plaintiff:
Kenneth F Davis
Defendant:
Gaylon Lay, Lorie Taylor, James Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordy v. Russell County Sheriff's Office et al (INMATE2)
as 3:2007cv00985
Plaintiff:
Michael Gordy
Defendant:
Russell County Sheriff's Office and Kenneth Edwin Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. SENATOR et al
as 1:2007cv01686
Plaintiff:
KENNETH T. DAVIS
Defendant:
SENATOR, GOVERNOR, KAREN BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. MET LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2007cv00980
Plaintiff:
KENNETH TYRONE DAVIS
Defendant:
MET LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
