Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Kelly v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 6:2012cv01983
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Kelly
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelly v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv05650
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Kelly
Defendant:
The City of New York and John Doe and Jane Doe #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephen Pierson v. Kenneth Kelly et al
as 2:2012cv06051
Defendant:
John DiBartolo, Does, Kenneth Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Pierson
Kelly v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv01661
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Kelly
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michaud v. Calderone et al
as 1:2012cv10540
Plaintiff:
Patrick Michaud
Defendant:
Lawrence A Calderone, Kenneth Kelly, Jeffrey Firnstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Craft et al v. USA
as 1:2011cv02253
Plaintiff:
Melissa Craft , Emily Pellegrini , Aubrey Dempsey and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Lozada v. Weilminster et al
as 2:2011cv02049
Defendant:
William Allen, Eric Bartolotta, Steven Bernstein and others
Plaintiff:
Melissa Lozada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. Keller (INMATE 3)
as 2:2010cv00218
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Kelly
Defendant:
J. A. Keller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kelly v. Washington County Detention Center et al
as 5:2009cv05234
Plaintiff:
Bryan Kenneth Kelly
Defendant:
Washington County Detention Center and Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
