Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Miller v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
State of Arkansas v. Kimberly Miller
as 22-3274
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Arkansas
Defendant / Appellant:
Kimberly Toya Miller
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ammirante et al v. Ohio County Board of Education et al
as 5:2019cv00012
Defendant:
Kimberly S. Miller, Ohio County Board of Education, Rick Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Ammirante, Autumn Troullos and Rachel Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KATONA et al
as 2:2017cv01376
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DOUGLAS S. KATONA and KIMBERLY A. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Gardner v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2017cv00391
Plaintiff:
Justin Gardner
Defendant:
Douglas A. Johnson, Kimberly Pankonin Miller, Matthew J. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Berryhill
as 8:2017cv00118
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Kimberly L. Miller
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Miller v. Upton
as 4:2016cv01132
Petitioner:
Kimberly Jean Miller
Defendant:
Jody R Upton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
